COVID-19 Prevention Behaviours and Vaccine Acceptability, and Their Association with a Behaviour Change Campaign in Somalia: Analysis of a Longitudinal Cohort.

Somalia experienced its first wave of COVID-19 infections in March 2020 and has experienced fluctuating infection levels since. Longitudinal data on suspected cases of COVID-19, attitudes, and behaviours were collected by telephone interviews of cash-transfer programme beneficiaries from June 2020-April 2021. A multi-media Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) campaign was designed and implemented from February 2021 to May 2021. Between the end of the first wave and the onset of the second the perceived threat from COVID-19 increased, with the proportion of respondents viewing it as a major threat increasing from 46% to 70% (p = 0.021). Use of face coverings increased by 24% (p < 0.001) and hand shaking and hugging for social greeting decreased, with 17% and 23% more people abstaining from these practices (p = 0.001). A combined preventative behaviour score (PB-Score) increased by 1.3 points (p < 0.0001) with a higher score in female respondents (p < 0.0001). During wave 2, vaccine acceptance was reported by 69.9% (95% CI 64.9, 74.5), overall. Acceptance decreased with increasing age (p = 0.009) and was higher in males (75.5%) than females (67.0%) (p = 0.015). Awareness of the SBCC campaign was widespread with each of the 3 key campaign slogans having been heard by at least 67% of respondents. Awareness of 2 specific campaign slogans was independently associated with an increased use of face coverings (aOR 2.31; p < 0.0001) and vaccine acceptance (aOR 2.36; p < 0.0001). Respondents reported receiving information on the pandemic from a wide range of sources with mobile phones and radio the most common. Trust in different sources ranged widely.

Addressing another threat to food safety: Conflict

Conflicts across the globe affect food security and also have a heavy toll on food safety. Many of the areas affected by conflict are breadbaskets for multiple countries. When the production of staple crops is compromised by diverse conflicts, it becomes necessary to grow them somewhere else to satisfy local, regional, and/or international requirements. However, if that production is done in tropical and subtropical zones, it must be done incorporating strategies to prevent mycotoxin contamination, which has negative health, social, and economic impacts. Otherwise, increased production of susceptible crops in mycotoxin-prone areas may augment the already occurring negative impacts, which are severe in the global south.

Financial Inclusion or Encampment? Rethinking Digital Finance for Refugees

Humanitarian actors touting financial inclusion posit that access to financial services builds refugees' resilience and self-reliance. They claim that new digital financial tools create more efficient and dignified pathways for humanitarian assistance and enable refugees to better manage their savings and invest in livelihoods, especially during protracted displacement. Our in-depth, repeat interviews with refugees in Kenya and Jordan refute this narrative. Instead, self-reliance was hindered primarily by refugees' lack of foundational rights to move and work. Financial services had limited ability to support livelihoods in the absence of those rights. The digital financial services offered to refugees under the banner of ‘financial inclusion' were not mainstream services designed to empower and connect. Instead, they were segregated, second-class offerings meant to further isolate and limit refugee transactions in line with broader political desires to encamp and exclude them. The article raises questions about the circumstances in which humanitarian funding ought to fund financial service interventions and what those interventions are capable of achieving.

Not only COVID-19. Not only Ukraine. Under-reported hunger crises in the Horn of Africa and the politics around them.

Funding requirements for humanitarian needs have reached a record high, driven by Ukraine's war, other conflicts worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change-related disasters, economic slowdown, and their combined global consequences. More people are in need of humanitarian assistance, and more are forcibly displaced than ever before, the majority of them from countries facing acute food insecurity. The largest global food crisis in modern history is unfolding. Particularly, in the Horn of Africa, levels of hunger are alarmingly high, with countries edging close to famine. This article discusses why and how famine, which had declined in frequency and lethality, is resurging, using Somalia and Ethiopia as 'mini case studies', emblematic as they are of a broader trend. Technical and political aspects of food crises and their consequences on health are analysed. The article examines some of the most contentious issues around famine: the data challenges for declaring it and the use of starvation as a weapon of war. The article concludes with the claim that the elimination of famine is possible, but only through political action. Humanitarians can warn of an impending crisis and mitigate some of its consequences, but they are powerless in the face of an ongoing famine, like those described in Somalia and Ethiopia.

COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy in Health Care Workers in Somalia: Findings from a Fragile Country with No Previous Experience of Mass Adult Immunization.

Coverage of COVID-19 vaccines in Somalia remains low, including among health workers. This study aimed to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among health workers. In this cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, 1476 health workers in government and private health facilities in Somalia's federal member states were interviewed face-to-face about their perceptions of and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated health workers were included. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Participants were evenly distributed by sex, and their mean age was 34 (standard deviation 11.8) years. The overall prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 38.2%. Of the 564 unvaccinated participants, 39.0% remained hesitant. The factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were: being a primary health care worker (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-4.90) or a nurse (aOR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.05-4.25); having a master's degree (aOR = 5.32, 95% CI: 1.28-22.23); living in Hirshabelle State (aOR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.68-6.20); not having had COVID-19 (aOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.15-3.32); and having received no training on COVID-19 (aOR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.32). Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines in Somalia, a large proportion of unvaccinated health workers remain hesitant about being vaccinated, potentially influencing the public's willingness to take the vaccine. This study provides vital information to inform future vaccination strategies to achieve optimal coverage.

Population-based sero-epidemiological investigation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Somalia.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Somalia by measuring the seroprevalence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the general population. METHODS: We recruited a convenience sample of 2751 participants from among individuals attending outpatient and inpatient departments of public health facilities, or their accompanying family members. Participants were interviewed to collect sociodemographic data and provided a blood sample. We calculated seropositivity rates overall and by sex, age group, state, residence, education and marital status. We used logistic regression analysis - odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) - to investigate sociodemographic correlates of seropositivity. RESULTS: The overall seropositivity rate was 56.4% (95% CI 54.5-58.3%), while 8.8% of participants reported being previously diagnosed with COVID-19 by July 2021. In the regression analysis, after controlling for covariates, urban residence was significantly asscoiated with seropositivity: OR = 1.74 (95% CI: 1.19-2.55). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high seroprevalence rate of SARS-CoV-2 in the Somali population (56.4%), and indicate that many infections have not been captured by the country's surveillance system resulting in considerable under-reporting.

Value of Verbal Autopsy in a Fragile Setting: Reported versus Estimated Community Deaths Associated with COVID-19, Banadir, Somalia.

BACKGROUND: Accurate mortality data associated with infectious diseases such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are often unavailable in countries with fragile health systems such as Somalia. We compared officially reported COVID-19 deaths in Somalia with COVID-19 deaths estimated using verbal autopsy. METHODS: We interviewed relatives of deceased persons to collect information on symptoms, cause, and place of death. We compared these data with officially reported data and estimated the positive and negative predictive values of verbal autopsy. RESULTS: We identified 530 deaths during March-October 2020. We classified 176 (33.2%) as probable COVID-19 deaths. Most deaths (78.5%; 416/530) occurred at home and 144 (34.6%) of these were attributed to COVID-19. The positive predictive value of verbal autopsy was lower for home deaths (22.3%; 95% CI: 15.7-30.1%) than for hospital deaths (32.3%; 95% CI: 16.7-51.4%). The negative predictive value was higher: 97.8% (95% CI: 95.0-99.3%) for home deaths and 98.4% (95% CI: 91.5-100%) for hospital deaths. Conclusions Verbal autopsy has acceptable predictive value to estimate COVID-19 deaths where disease prevalence is high and can provide data on the COVID-19 burden in countries with low testing and weak mortality surveillance where home deaths may be missed.

Investigation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies among the paediatric population in Mogadishu, Somalia.

BACKGROUND: We undertook this cross-sectional study to determine the level of circulating anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunoglobulins (IgM and IgG) in children, as well as to evaluate other potential risk factors. METHODS: Children attending the outpatient department of the SOS and Benadir Hospitals in Mogadishu from 26 July to 8 August 2021 were selected following parental consent. The children (aged <18 y) were screened using the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rapid test lateral flow immune-assay kit. RESULTS: Of the 500 children screened for COVID-19, 32 (6.4%) tested positive, out of which 26 (5.2%) had IgG antibodies, while five (1%) had IgM, with the other child (0.2%) having both circulating IgG and IgM antibodies. Also, 46.9% of the COVID-19-positive children were asymptomatic without any clinical signs of the disease. Children aged >6 y and those attending school were the most affected (p=0.002). The most common clinical features among positive children were fever (22.6%), cough (22.2%), shortness of breath (5.8%) and loss of smell (2.6%) and taste (2.2%). Similarly, not wearing a facemask as a preventive measure was found to be a significant risk factor (p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that children are at risk of contracting COVID-19 infection. Our study also shows evidence of a high rate of IgG antibodies in school-aged children having close contact with infected adults, in those not wearing facemasks, as well as in those with a family history of comorbidities.

Understanding the Foremost Challenges in the Transition to Online Teaching and Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review

The study aims to understand the foremost challenges in the transition to online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study adopts the PRISMA approach to screening the selection of journal articles and review papers according to the research aims and the inclusion criteria. The journal articles and review papers were extracted and stored in Microsoft Excel and Google Scholar, Academic. Microsoft, Semantic Scholar, Elsevier, and Emerald Insight databases searched relevant documents using formulated keywords. A statistical technique was applied using the M.S. Excel analysis tool (PivotTable and an independent t-Test) to analyze data and determine the differences between teachers and students. The review revealed the evidence that the majority of the studies were primarily focused on the individual developing countries and results from other developing countries were not considered. In addition, the foremost challenges in the transition to online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic were inadequate skills and training, inadequate Internet/Infrastructure, lack of supporting resources and lack of online student engagement and feedback. Finally, the independent t-test reveals there is no statistically significant difference in challenges in the transition to online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both teachers and students encounter similar challenges. The systematic review raised concerns that higher learning needs to effectively implement long term strategies and support teachers and students in getting into online teaching and learning.

Outcomes after Acute Malnutrition Program Adaptations to COVID-19, Uganda, Ethiopia, and Somalia.

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, protocols for community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM) were implemented to support continuity of essential feeding services while mitigating COVID-19 transmission. To assess correlations between adaptation timing and CMAM program indicators, we evaluated routine program data in Uganda, Ethiopia, and Somalia for children 6-59 months of age. We specifically analyzed facility-level changes in total admissions, average length of stay (ALOS), total children screened for admission, and recovery rates before and after adaptations. We found no statistically significant changes in program indicators after adaptations. For Somalia, we also analyzed child-level changes in ALOS and in weight and mid-upper arm circumference at admission and discharge. ALOS significantly increased immediately after adaptations and then decreased to preadaptation levels. We found no meaningful changes in either weight or mid-upper arm circumference at admission or discharge. These findings indicate that adapted CMAM programs can remain effective.

COVID-19 and its prevention in internally displaced person (IDP) camps in Somalia: impact on livelihood, food security and mental health.

BACKGROUND: Somalia has over 2.6 million internally displaced people (IDP) that depend on daily wages and humanitarian assistance for their livelihoods. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on livelihoods, food security and mental health of Somalia's IDPs. METHODS: A questionnaire was conducted with "breadwinners" (n = 585) residing in 15 randomly selected IDP camps. Mental health was assessed using the 5-item World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (WHO-5) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Multivariable regression was used to explore the effect of depressive symptoms on soap use and ability to pay for food/medicine/rent. RESULTS: Knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission and prevention was relatively high, however only 55% reported using soap for hand washing. Around one third perceived that prohibition of public gatherings had negatively impacted weekly earnings. Participants reported difficulty buying food (85%), medicine (82%) and paying rent (51%) because of COVID-19. The majority were assessed as having low wellbeing and high depressive symptoms (mean WHO-5 = 44.2/100; mean PHQ-9 = 18.6/27), with most (74%) indicating that they felt worse than before the pandemic. Compared to people with low depressive symptoms, people with high depressive symptoms were less likely to use soap (aOR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2, 0.7; P < 0.001) and more likely to report difficulty buying food (aOR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.1, 4.3; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 and associated restrictions have negatively impacted Somalia's internally displaced population. Livelihood and mental health support is urgently needed in the recovery phase of the pandemic and should be factored into future pandemic planning.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in conflict zones: A review of current literature.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) is prevalent in conflict zones due to a lack of essential resources and knowledge, thereby escalating the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) cases in these territories. This has resulted in a higher incidence of cases from exposure to a single COVID-19 positive case and further burdens the health care system of conflict zones which are already on the brink of collapsing. Aim: This narrative review aims to determine VH to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in five conflict zones that include Somalia, Yemen, Palestine, Syria, and Afghanistan. Methodology: A Boolean search was carried out in MEDLINE-PubMed from inception till 6 June 2022. The search was performed by using the following keywords: "(SARS-CoV-2 OR covid OR covid 19) AND (vaccine hesitancy OR covid vaccine acceptance OR intention to vaccinate) AND (Syria OR Yemen OR Palestine OR Afghanistan OR Somalia"). The full text of all relevant articles in English along with their supplementary material was extracted. Results: All the included studies reported at least 30% or more increase in vaccine hesitancy among conflict settings. VH was mostly due to a lack of available resources, lack of appropriate knowledge, and believing misleading rumors about the vaccine. Discussion: Considering the massive amount of reluctance among people residing in conflict zones, the need to take effective measures against VH is undoubtedly apparent. This can be accomplished by carrying out mass vaccinations by the governments and proper health education through raising the public awareness regarding vaccines, thereby eliminating rumors that exacerbate the fear of adverse effects. Conclusion: The approach described in this article to combat VH can be implemented to increase vaccination rates and significantly alleviate R0 across the globe.

Academic Scholars Perception of Online Education Initiatives in Somalia

This paper examines the Perception of the academic community in Somalia on implementation of online teaching and learning methods during the covid-19 pandemic. The pandemic created a significant challenge for the universities in Somalia. The paper implements a modified version of the open, online, flexible and technology enhanced (OOFAT) methodology with three main categories: content delivery, flexibility impact and platform adaptation. The data has been collected through online questionnaires and interviews involving 70 university educators in Somalia. The study found that instructors who had low degree of content delivery online with flexibility applications weakened the process of teaching and learning. In addition, the study suggested that the instructors lacked adequate knowledge on basic ICT literacy and showed a higher level of barrier of adaptation on online learning and teaching tools. The author argues that the higher education intuitions responsibility to build the capacity of academic staff regarding ICT literacy and provide a scholarly communication platform to enhance their knowledge and technology awareness and exposure. Copyright © 2021 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved.

WASH responses to COVID-19 in Ethiopia, Somalia and South Sudan

In the face of COVID-19, innovation, adaptation, and learning from experience have all been crucial to meeting the needs of those who have been displaced. In order to respond to this new disease, the humanitarian community had to get familiar with COVID-19. It was understood from the beginning that basic hygiene precautions, such adequate handwashing, could aid in preventing its transmission. However, a lot of displacement settings lack the infrastructure needed to put household and community-level infection prevention and control (IPC) measures into place. They might also have inadequate governance structures for overseeing and maintaining WASH services. Some of the hardest-to-reach populations are found in displacement contexts like Ethiopia, Somalia, and South Sudan, where people lack the resources to defend themselves and deal with health threats. Disease vulnerability may be exacerbated by overcrowding and restricted access to proper WASH facilities. In the meantime, xenophobia and stigma can develop due to the fear surrounding COVID-19 as well as the dissemination of false information. As new information became available and lessons were discovered, IOM teams operating in these environments had to modify their Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) and IPC efforts. Any disaster response has traditionally included funding for capacity building for hygiene promotion to strengthen local responses, but COVID-19 demanded more localisation because of the absence of international travel. It demonstrated how supporting local structures can help solidify hygiene promotion capacities while obviating the requirement for a high degree of international assistance in the event of future outbreaks by highlighting considerable local capacity and willingness in some communities.

Experts, electricity ‘not needed’ for health innovations

Speed read WHO compendium of innovations aims to help low-resource settings respond to COVID-19 Collection of tools doesn’t require specialists or electricity, says WHO Grassroots capacity building crucial for scale-up — expert Easy-to-use equipment including portable respiratory monitoring systems and ventilators with extended battery life are among a collection of new health innovations identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) to help manage COVID-19 in low-resource settings. Jeremiah Owiti, executive director, Centre for Independent Research, Nairobi Adriana Velazquez Berumen, WHO senior advisor for medical devices, said: “WHO has been collecting innovative technologies that can be impactful at places where there is unstable electricity and a lack of specialised health workforce.” According to Anuraj Shankar, lead researcher at the Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit in Jakarta, Indonesia, enabling anyone to asses blood pressure accurately with an already available device such as a smartphone opens the door to personal monitoring of many acute and chronic medical conditions.

Among Refugees of War from Ukraine, Yemen and Syria, Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome is the Commonest Diagnosis among Health CTR Visits

War conflicts are not anymore located only to African and Asian subcontinent or to developing and less democratic countries, but after stopping the armed tensions: Zimbabwe in 2018;Ethiopia & Somalia in 2020;Libya in 2021;DRC in 2022, Middle east and Central Europe are surprisingly leading parts of the world with armed conflicts resulting to large numbers of internally displaced(l) war refugees (11) and subsequent unrest migrants(iii). The aim of this survey is to compare the commonest diseases reported by the migrants and refugees at Outpatient Departments (OPD) of clinics being served by SEUC tropic-team and migrant health teams at border spots within the last 6 years.

COVID-19 and sustainable development in Somalia/Somaliland

The research aimed to understand the impact of COVID-19 and responses to it on sustainable development in Somalia and its breakaway region Somaliland. It explored how sustainable development could be protected and promoted through, during and as a method of COVID-19 response. It explored the themes of lives, livelihoods and inclusion. Due to COVID-19, it used three non-face-to-face methods: desk-based analysis of literature and secondary data;175 phone interviews;and five phone Focus Group Discussions. The research was co-produced with 40 participants, which ensured that the study was carried out with as well as for those who could potentially benefit from it. COVID-19 and responses to it have generated intense and multi-dimensional concerns and deprivation, especially among those on low incomes. Livelihoods are being destroyed but people are receiving little or no financial support. People are receiving too little help to cope with the many problems they face. Limited action to prevent COVID-19 infection is more due to structural and social factors than lack of information. Public health education is still necessary;it should include challenging stigmatisation, explaining that wearing a face covering does not mean a person is infectious, and explaining that those recovered from the virus are not still infectious. Health care is mostly unavailable, unaffordable and not trusted. There is broad and deep agreement across all major issues explored in the research, including the immediate actions needed and the fundamentals of what building back better would mean. Responses to COVID-19 have mainly had the effect of undermining the prospects for sustainable development in Somalia/Somaliland. Despite this, the existence of broad and deep agreement on the major issues explored in the research could form the basis of a new commitment to sustainable development.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual function in women with female genital mutilation.

We aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual function in women with female genital mutilation (FGM) in Somalia. This cross-sectional study was conducted on women with FGM attending the gynaecologic outpatient clinic of our hospital, between March and June 2021, using a validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire with a physical examination based on FGM typing. Those women who refused to participate, those with mental illness, uncontrolled systemic disease, drug, alcohol, or khat addiction, pregnant, genital prolapse, gynaecological or urological cancer, previous pelvic surgery, premature ovarian failure, genital skin diseases, drug use that affects sexual function and those with or suspected of having COVID-19 infection were excluded. A total of 201 sexually active women enrolled, with a mean age of 29 (14-55) years. Comparison of FSFI scores and the COVID-19 pandemic, a statistically significant worsening in the mean FSFI scores and all its domains (p<.001, for each). All of the domains of the FSFI were determined higher before and during the pandemic except pain. There is a decline in female sexual functioning during the COVID-19 outbreak in women with FGM. FGM is a major public health concern necessitating urgent response in Somalia.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? As it stands, there is a body of research on sexual behaviour during COVID-19 pandemic, but a lack of conclusive evidence. However, our knowledge of the sexual function of women with FGM during the COVID-19 pandemic is largely based on very limited data.What do the results of this study add? There is a decline in female sexual functioning during COVID-19 pandemic in women with female genital mutilation in Somalia.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? FGM is a major public health problem necessitating urgent response worldwide. There is an urgent need to implement FGM prevention programmes and raise public awareness in order to eradicate this harmful practice.

COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage and Potential Drivers of Vaccine Uptake among Healthcare Workers in SOMALIA: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are one of the most vulnerable groups for contracting COVID-19 and dying as a result of it. Over 10,000 HCWs in Africa have been infected with COVID-19, according to the World Health Organization, making it a substantial occupational health threat for HCWs. To that end, Somalia's Ministry of Health has ordered that all healthcare personnel obtain the COVID-19 vaccination to safeguard themselves and the community they serve. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the COVID-19 vaccination coverage and its associated factors among healthcare workers in Somalia. A cross-sectional study was employed to examine COVID-19 vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel in Somalia. The data were obtained via an online questionnaire supplied by Google forms between December 2021 and February 2022, where a total of 1281 healthcare workers from the various federal states of Somalia were recruited. A multinomial regression analysis was used to analyse the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Overall, 1281 HCWs participated (630 females, 651 males) with a mean age and standard deviation of 27.7 years ± 7.1. The overall vaccine coverage was 37.4%. Sex, age, the state of residency, education level, specialization, hospital COVID-19 policy, vaccine availability at the centre, COVID-19 treatment centre, and health facility level were the factors that influenced the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among health professionals in Somalia. Male healthcare employees were 2.2 times (odds ratio-OR = 2.2; confidence interval-CI: 1.70, 2.75, p < 0.001) more likely than female healthcare workers to be fully vaccinated. The survey discovered that the COVID-19 vaccine coverage among health professionals was quite low, with the major contributing factors being accessibility, security challenges and literary prowess. Additional efforts to enhance vaccination uptake are needed to improve the COVID-19 vaccination coverage.

Adverse events following introduction of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in Somalia in 2021: findings from a fragile setting and implications for the future.

Background: Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in Somalia on 16 March 2021 with the Covishield (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine. However, by the end of 2021, only a small percentage of the population had been fully vaccinated. As side effects play an important role in determining public confidence in vaccines and their uptake, this study aimed to examine reported adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) of vaccine recipients. Methods: This cross-sectional-survey-based study was conducted between March and October 2021 in Somalia. Vaccine recipients who were eligible to receive the first dose of the Covishield vaccine in the first phase of COVID-19 vaccination were eligible for study inclusion. P<0.05 was considered to indicate significance. Results: Of the 149,985 respondents who had received the first dose of the Covishield vaccine, 378 reported side effects. This represented a reported AEFI rate of 2.5 per 1000 population. Amongst those who reported adverse events, males (2.8 per 1000; P<0.001), respondents aged 35-49 years (3.3 per 1000; P=0.001) and teachers (3.5 per 1000; P=0.000) had higher rates of adverse events compared with females, other age groups and other occupations. Amongst population settlement types, a higher rate of AEFIs was observed amongst refugees (23.9 per 1000; P=0.000) and internally displaced populations (19 per 1000; P=0.000). Nearly half of the vaccine recipients who reported side effects (48%) reported one local symptom, and most symptoms were mild in nature. The probability of having acute and severe side effects was found to be 66% lower among males compared with females [odds ratio (OR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.73; P=0.002]. Respondents aged >60 years (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.64-3.62; P=0.34) were more likely to develop acute and severe AEFIs. None of the study population reported any severe life-threatening symptoms or death. Conclusion: Some variables (sex, profession, age) put recipients at higher odds of acute and severe AEFIs, but the Covishield vaccine generally produced mild side effects in a small proportion of the vaccinated population in Somalia. This study confirms that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, and their benefits clearly outweigh any associated risk.